Nepal: Manufacturers and exporters say they are in a dilemma over trade with India following the restrictive measures imposed by New Delhi on Nepali goods. Making matters worse is the Nepali government’s silence even though the goods have not been sold to India for months.
Dol
Raj Adhikari, president of the Nepal Sanitary and Diaper Association, said
sanitary pads and diapers worth of Rs250 million had been stranded in the
warehouses for the past three months.
“We
completed all the processes to acquire the Bureau of Indian Standards [BIS]
certificate to export our products, but no team from India is coming to inspect
the factory. We even wrote to the Indian authority multiple times but our
requests have fallen on deaf ears.”
As
per the provision, once the Indian inspection team gives a green signal after
factory inspection, goods can be exported to India.
In
2020, the Indian government asked the BIS to prescribe mandatory standards for
imported goods in line with international quality norms. The move aimed to
prevent Chinese goods from entering India from any of its neighbours.
After
the suppression of Chinese apps, the Indian government imposed import
restrictions on more than 370 Chinese products.
Insiders
say India does not want any products from Nepal that have Chinese components,
including Nepal’s hydroelectricity, greatly worrying Nepal’s top exporters.
The
BIS deals with the marking and certifying of goods, incorporating quality
standards and information on international norms to be followed while
importing.
The
rules worry Adhikari, who owns the AG Health Industries Private Limited that
produces sanitary pads and diapers in Bhairahawa. “India seems intent to halt
imports from Nepal,” said Adhikari.
According
to the association, Nepal used to export three truckloads of sanitary pads and
diapers daily. There are 29 sanitary pads and diaper factories in Nepal, both
large and small, employing 6,000 workers.
Sanitary
pads and diaper factories used to operate 12 hours a day when the demand
boomed, but due to the export obstacles, factories have reduced operating hours
by 4 hours, said Adhikari.
According
to the Department of Customs, Nepal exported 201.99 million pieces of sanitary
pads and diapers worth Rs719 million to India in the last fiscal year, ending
mid-July.
Likewise,
a big consignment of Goldstar shoes failed to get export clearance after India
refused to issue the BIS certificate, putting Nepal’s homegrown shoemaker on
the brink.
Exporters
said there were rumours on Friday that India had extended the deadline to
obtain a BIS certificate, and the Nepali exporters were allowed to export goods
with their existing certificates.
“But
we have not received any formal notice from the Indian authority on the time
extension of the BIS certificate,” said Baburam Adhikari, spokesperson for the
Ministry of Industry, Commerce and Supplies. “If the BIS had made such a
decision, we would have been informed.”
“Neither
the BIS India nor the domestic industries has confirmed or communicated with us
on the issue.”
Meetings
were held, and the issue was forwarded even during Industry Minister Damodar
Bhandari’s visit to India in August. “However, there is no progress,” said
Adhikari.
Adhikari
said none of the Nepali exporters who applied for the BIS certificate have
gotten it till now.
“The
BIS certificate issue has put the industries in Rupandehi in a big dilemma.
They were opened to export goods to India,” said Thakur Kumar Shrestha,
president of the Siddhartha Chamber of Commerce and Industry. It has negatively
impacted both the industries and Nepal’s trade.
Shrestha
said factories are either running at half capacity or getting shut down, and
workers are being laid off.
Exports
from the cement makers in Rupandehi—such as Arghakhanchi Cement, Sarbottam
Cement, Palpa Cement, and Balaji Cement—have completely stopped for nearly two
months.
“Even
as the domestic consumption of cement declined, production was not impacted due
to the huge demand from India. But now cement plants in Rupandehi are on the
verge of shutting down or running under-capacity,” said Shrestha.
Except
plywood, the export of all the listed goods that require a BIS certificate has
come to a halt, said Shrestha. “India has neither renewed the certificate nor
provided a new one.”
Goods
under the BIS with compulsory certification are any variety of cement
manufactured or sold in India, steel and iron products, chemicals, fertiliser,
polymers and textiles, cables, flat transparent sheet glass, cattle feed,
footwear, centrifugally cast (spun) iron pipes, jute bags, viscose staple
fibres, geo textiles, portable water bottles, plywood, and wooden flush door
shutters, among others.
“Plywood
is currently not restricted. But despite having already paid the BIS charges
and completed the process, the inspection team from India has not provided a
BIS certificate for Nepali goods,” said Hom Prasad Ghimire, president of the
Nepal Plywood Manufacturers Association. Ghimire said that his company
completed the process of getting the BIS certificate in June.
He
said the Nepali plywood is of better quality than the Indian plywood.
He
said that out of 80 plywood factories, 52 have even deposited charges to obtain
the certificate. The plywood industry employs 25,000 workers across the
country.
According
to the association, Nepal exported Rs8 billion worth of plywood to India. The
volume could have increased had the exports not been interrupted.
Trade
with India has been repeatedly obstructed. Experts say there is a need to seek
long-term solutions for uninterrupted trade with the southern neighbour.
“There
must be a mutual recognition agreement on select exportable items. Under such
an agreement, exportable goods certified by the government will be recognised
by the Indian government. This would be the best long-term solution for
standard certification,” said Posh Raj Pandey, chairman of the South Asia Watch
of Economics, Environment and Trade.
Under
the 2009 bilateral trade agreement with Nepal, India agreed to support the
setting up of standard-purpose labs, said Pandey. However, Nepal has not been
able to push for the labs during talks with India— even after 15 years of the
agreement.
He
said lack of coordination among government agencies and frequent changes of
bureaucrats have put the issue on the back burner.
0 Comments